Forced Drugging and Vaccination of Children 
	 In the US judges can constitutionally order controversial drugs to be given 
to a child over the opposition of his parents. Parents are medicating their 
children for fear of having them hauled away by Child Protective Services. In 
the UK Parents of children diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder 
(ADHD) will face jail under proposals in the new Mental Health Bill if they 
refuse to drug their children, a psychiatrist has warned.
In the US judges can constitutionally order controversial drugs to be given 
to a child over the opposition of his parents. Parents are medicating their 
children for fear of having them hauled away by Child Protective Services. In 
the UK Parents of children diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder 
(ADHD) will face jail under proposals in the new Mental Health Bill if they 
refuse to drug their children, a psychiatrist has warned.
	Some US Courts may force Parents to Medicate Children - Some public schools are accusing 
parents of child abuse when they balk at giving their kids drugs such as Ritalin, 
and as judges begin to agree, some parents are medicating their children for 
fear of having them hauled away by authorities. There is a growing debate about 
diagnosing and medicating children with attention deficit disorder (ADD) and
attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
	
	Related: 
	
	Judge rules family can't refuse chemo for boy
 
A Minnesota judge has ruled that a 13-year-old boy with a highly treatable form of cancer must seek conventional 
medical treatment over his parents' objections.
	The Drugging of Our Children and Decline of American Education
	 It is estimated that in the United States between 4 million and 8 million children 
are on Ritalin, the drug being used to change the behavior of children afflicted 
with a so-called ''disease'' called Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) or Attention 
Deficit H...yperactive Disorder ADHD. We already know that the long-term use 
of Ritalin can be fatal.
It is estimated that in the United States between 4 million and 8 million children 
are on Ritalin, the drug being used to change the behavior of children afflicted 
with a so-called ''disease'' called Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) or Attention 
Deficit H...yperactive Disorder ADHD. We already know that the long-term use 
of Ritalin can be fatal.
	What parents are not being told by psychiatrists who 
prescribe the drug and the school nurses who give it to the kids is that taking 
Ritalin is like playing Russian roulette, simply because nobody can be sure 
what the side-effects will be. Why would anyone subject a child to a drug with 
so many possible harmful side effects simply to ''treat'' an attention problem? 
	How about creating classrooms with more order and fewer distractions. This week's 
guest, Samuel L. Blumenfeld, has published ten books on education in America, 
and he has spent much of his career investigating the decline in American literacy, 
the reasons for the high rate of learning disabilities in American children, 
the reasons why so many children are labeled ADD, and why the school system 
refuses to use intensive phonics in reading instruction.
	Some public schools are accusing parents of child abuse when they balk at 
giving their kids drugs such as Ritalin, (or AZT) and as judges begin to agree, 
some parents are medicating their children for fear of having them hauled away.
	"There is a war raging over the control of our children. The cry of outrage 
is spreading across this nation, as increasing numbers of children are wrongfully 
ripped from their loving parent's arms and secreted away by the unscrupulous 
agents of the State".
	 
	"Take the Pills, or We'll Take Your Kids!"
	by David Crowe
	Jane Doe in Montreal refuses to give toxic, lifelong medication to her two 
healthy sons, and loses custody of them. Another woman in Montreal hears this 
and decides to have an abortion.
	A woman in Maine has a daughter die on this medication, and finds that the 
debilitating symptoms she and her son were also experiencing rapidly disappear 
after stopping. The State takes her to court, but she wins her case.
	 
	 A couple in Oregon are less fortunate. They are "legally" forced to medicate 
their infant and the mother forbidden to nurse him! A woman in British Columbia 
is harassed by social workers who threaten to force her to medicate her two 
children, and then hastily leaves the province.
A couple in Oregon are less fortunate. They are "legally" forced to medicate 
their infant and the mother forbidden to nurse him! A woman in British Columbia 
is harassed by social workers who threaten to force her to medicate her two 
children, and then hastily leaves the province.
	 A couple in London refuse to test their baby and flee from England after 
losing their case, fearing that forced medication will follow forced testing.
	All these people have one thing in common--both they and their children are 
	HIV-positive. They all reject the need for medication for their condition, and 
for their HIV-positive children. In fact, they question whether the HIV test 
indicates an illness at all.
	Long Term Danger of ADHD drug prescriptions
	 For decades, the majority of American doctors, mental health professionals, 
the media, and the general public have yielded to the disseminations of Harvard 
psychiatrist Joseph Biedeman who successfully evangelized for more children 
-- and younger children -- to be medicated with powerful psychiatric drugs. 
The blowback from ADHD drugs is reported in the current July 2009 Scientific 
American Mind article "Do ADHD Drugs Take a Toll on the Brain?" a comprehensive 
report of the long-term dangers of ADHD drugs such as Ritalin, Concerta, Adderall, 
and Vyvanse. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) estimated in 2005 that 9% 
of boys and 4% of girls in the U.S. were taking ADHD stimulant medications; 
and according to a 2007 study, ADHD-drug prescriptions rose by almost 12 percent 
a year between 2000 and 2005.
 
For decades, the majority of American doctors, mental health professionals, 
the media, and the general public have yielded to the disseminations of Harvard 
psychiatrist Joseph Biedeman who successfully evangelized for more children 
-- and younger children -- to be medicated with powerful psychiatric drugs. 
The blowback from ADHD drugs is reported in the current July 2009 Scientific 
American Mind article "Do ADHD Drugs Take a Toll on the Brain?" a comprehensive 
report of the long-term dangers of ADHD drugs such as Ritalin, Concerta, Adderall, 
and Vyvanse. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) estimated in 2005 that 9% 
of boys and 4% of girls in the U.S. were taking ADHD stimulant medications; 
and according to a 2007 study, ADHD-drug prescriptions rose by almost 12 percent 
a year between 2000 and 2005.
	Direct Link between Violence and Antidepressant Drugs
	
	 Julian Whitaker, M.D., believes there is a direct link between the violent 
shootings and the increased and indiscriminate use of popular antidepressant 
drugs. Dr. Whitaker points out that many of the gun-related massacres that have 
made the headlines over the past decade have a common thread: they were perpetrated 
by people taking Prozac, Zoloft, Luvox, Paxil, or a related drug. A documented 
side effect of these drugs -- known clinically as selective serotonin reuptake 
inhibitors (SSRIs) -- is akathisia, or physical and mental agitation. Dr. Whitaker 
says "akathisia is to violence what a match is to gasoline. And this condition 
has been reported in a significant number of Prozac users." Moreover, the Food 
and Drug Administration has received over 40,000 reports detailing adverse effects related to Prozac.
Julian Whitaker, M.D., believes there is a direct link between the violent 
shootings and the increased and indiscriminate use of popular antidepressant 
drugs. Dr. Whitaker points out that many of the gun-related massacres that have 
made the headlines over the past decade have a common thread: they were perpetrated 
by people taking Prozac, Zoloft, Luvox, Paxil, or a related drug. A documented 
side effect of these drugs -- known clinically as selective serotonin reuptake 
inhibitors (SSRIs) -- is akathisia, or physical and mental agitation. Dr. Whitaker 
says "akathisia is to violence what a match is to gasoline. And this condition 
has been reported in a significant number of Prozac users." Moreover, the Food 
and Drug Administration has received over 40,000 reports detailing adverse effects related to Prozac.
	Illinois Shooter 
was Treated with Psych Medications Prior to Shooting Rampage It comes 
as no surprise to anyone who's been following school shootings all the way back 
to the Columbine High massacre in Colorado: Every young, male shooter that has 
gone on a killing spree in the United States also has a history of treatment 
with psychotropic drugs -- typically SSRI antidepressants. These shootings have 
three things in common: 1) The shooters are young males. 2) The shooters exhibit 
a mind-numbed disconnect with reality. 3) The shooters have a history of taking psychiatric medications.
	101 Reasons to Avoid Ritalin Like the Plague
	 This book captures the bigger picture of all that is sacrificed with the pivotal decision to put a child on Ritalin 
or medications. There are so many physical and psychological side-effects that 
never get mentioned to the parent who is seeking help or being pressured by 
the school to do something about their child's behavior or poor performance 
at school. This book fights for the parent to have full disclosure of the truth. 
Parents are never told: "Oh by the way, once in a while a child dies simply 
by taking their prescribed medication, or by the way, children on stimulant 
medications have twice the future rate of drug abuse, or by the way, 1/3 of 
all children on these medications develop symptoms of obsessive compulsive 
behavior within the first year. Most doctors don't tell parents these things 
because they simply don't know. Most doctors get the majority of their information 
about these medications from the same pharmaceutical companies that have a tremendous 
vested interest in selling more and more medications each year. Most doctors 
can't tell parents the truth about the psychological side effects because they 
have no idea that simply giving children these drugs makes it near impossible 
for the child to deeply believe in themselves and their own power and resourcefulness 
but rather the child comes to be reliant on the hoped-for power of the medication.
This book captures the bigger picture of all that is sacrificed with the pivotal decision to put a child on Ritalin 
or medications. There are so many physical and psychological side-effects that 
never get mentioned to the parent who is seeking help or being pressured by 
the school to do something about their child's behavior or poor performance 
at school. This book fights for the parent to have full disclosure of the truth. 
Parents are never told: "Oh by the way, once in a while a child dies simply 
by taking their prescribed medication, or by the way, children on stimulant 
medications have twice the future rate of drug abuse, or by the way, 1/3 of 
all children on these medications develop symptoms of obsessive compulsive 
behavior within the first year. Most doctors don't tell parents these things 
because they simply don't know. Most doctors get the majority of their information 
about these medications from the same pharmaceutical companies that have a tremendous 
vested interest in selling more and more medications each year. Most doctors 
can't tell parents the truth about the psychological side effects because they 
have no idea that simply giving children these drugs makes it near impossible 
for the child to deeply believe in themselves and their own power and resourcefulness 
but rather the child comes to be reliant on the hoped-for power of the medication.
	 
	Warning on Selective Serotonin Re-uptake Inhibitor
	
	On Monday, March 22, 2004, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued 
a public health advisory putting doctors on notice and to be vigilant for signs 
of suicidality or worsening depression with the use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake 
Inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant drugs use. Patients, families and other caregivers 
are also warned. The Citizens Commission on Human Rights, 
an international psychiatric watchdog group, says the warning does not go far 
enough-the potential for antidepressants to cause suicidal and self-injurious 
behavior has been established-the drugs should not be prescribed to children at all.
	Drugging Children to Keep Them Quiet
	Dr. Mercola M.D.
	 This stunning news report finds that children, 
even toddlers as young as 2, are being given powerful psychotropic drugs in 
order to manage their behavior. Are these children being drugged because it 
is cheaper and easier than providing real care -- and because the practice is 
very lucrative for the pharmaceutical companies?
 
This stunning news report finds that children, 
even toddlers as young as 2, are being given powerful psychotropic drugs in 
order to manage their behavior. Are these children being drugged because it 
is cheaper and easier than providing real care -- and because the practice is 
very lucrative for the pharmaceutical companies?
	Drugged to Death - Our Kids and Our Troops
The rise of drug-induced acts of violence and suicide isn’t limited to our schools. 
In January 2009 it was reported that more of our military died of suicide than 
of combat deaths. Why is that? Could it be because our military are getting 
pumped full of psychiatric drugs? What Time Magazine referred to as “America’s Medicated Army?”
 
	
 Well if we are “medicating” our troops with antidepressants and anti-psychotics, drugs documented to cause suicidal 
reactions, let’s put 2 and 2 together and state the obvious—these drugs are 
minimally a contributing factor. Many people don’t realize that psychiatry’s 
love affair with the military dates back more than 90 years; During World War 
I the biggest problem the German military had was desertions—people leaving 
the front lines of the War. So the Germans turned to psychiatrists who came 
up with a solution: Electroshock. Psychiatrists theorized that if the shock 
soldiers experienced due to the brutalities of war made them desert the front 
lines, then another kind of shock—electroshock—could get them to be good little 
soldiers and willingly return to combat. Maybe because electroshock wiped out 
their memory, or maybe because soldiers chose to face the front lines rather 
than have another 450 volts of current tear through their brain, it worked. 
Psychiatry had come up with a winning strategy for the military to deal with 
reluctant soldiers and since that time the love affair between the two entities has never waned.
Well if we are “medicating” our troops with antidepressants and anti-psychotics, drugs documented to cause suicidal 
reactions, let’s put 2 and 2 together and state the obvious—these drugs are 
minimally a contributing factor. Many people don’t realize that psychiatry’s 
love affair with the military dates back more than 90 years; During World War 
I the biggest problem the German military had was desertions—people leaving 
the front lines of the War. So the Germans turned to psychiatrists who came 
up with a solution: Electroshock. Psychiatrists theorized that if the shock 
soldiers experienced due to the brutalities of war made them desert the front 
lines, then another kind of shock—electroshock—could get them to be good little 
soldiers and willingly return to combat. Maybe because electroshock wiped out 
their memory, or maybe because soldiers chose to face the front lines rather 
than have another 450 volts of current tear through their brain, it worked. 
Psychiatry had come up with a winning strategy for the military to deal with 
reluctant soldiers and since that time the love affair between the two entities has never waned.
	 
	Forced Drugging of Children with Cancer
	In memory of our son, Alexander Horwin
	On August 10, 1998 at age two, our son Alexander Horwin was diagnosed with 
the most common pediatric brain tumor, medulloblastoma. After Alexander endured 
two brain surgeries my husband and I located the best non-toxic therapy that had proven 
	successful in treating brain cancer. However, on September 21, 1998, 
the FDA denied Alexander access to this potentially life-saving treatment. 
The oncologists told us that without their "state-of-the-art" chemotherapy, 
the cancer would soon return. We knew nothing of the history, efficacy and actual 
danger of chemotherapy but instinctively knew it was a poor choice for therapy. 
Alexander completed his third month of chemotherapy in December 1998 and died 
on January 31, 1999. He was just two and a half years old.
	
	The "state-of-the-art" chemo protocol that the oncologists had administered to our son had proven its 
	ineffectiveness in pediatric brain tumors many years 
before. In fact, in 1994, the exact same chemo drugs Alexander received in 1998 
had been administered to children the same age with the same brain tumor (medulloblastoma) 
as Alexander. This experiment proved so unsuccessful that tumors spread within 
five months and the oncologists terminated the protocol. It was incredible to 
us to discover that chemotherapy that had already proven so ineffective that 
it required termination was being presented to parents as "state of the art" 
years later.
	We were never informed about the failure of this therapy. 
We also discovered that we weren't the only parents being purposefully 
misinformed. Today, parents are still being misled and children 
with brain cancer are still getting these same toxic drugs that have proven 
their ineffectiveness in the past. But even if you are informed that 
orthodox therapy does not work you still may not have a choice. When we hesitated 
to bring Alexander in for chemo the oncologists were already gearing up to take 
him from us by court order.
	Mother Jailed, Put On Trial for Curing Her Son of Melanoma
	
An unholy alliance of California Child Protective Services (CPS) with a hostile 
doctor and judge is attempting to railroad Laurie Jessop, framed as a threat 
to her son and the establishment for finding a way to cure him of 
malignant melanoma. She is now on trial, under a gag order, since she had 
gone to the press. When she was arrested, she was put in maximum security, solitary 
confinement, in the Orange County, CA jail. They claim that everything about. 
her says anti-Establishment, so she was told, as she was considered a threat 
in starting a riot.
	Pharmaceutical Terrorism and Mandatory Vaccination
	Dr Daniel H Duffy Sr.
	The very first words of the Nuremberg Principles issued following 
the Second World War and designed to outlaw Nazi medical experiments for all 
time were: “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential." 
Failure to stem the present tide of invasive compulsory medical procedures result 
in terrible consequences downstream as these forces grow more powerful and more 
oppressive. We will eventually experience total loss of our freedom to determine 
ours and our family’s own destiny, not only in health matters but in all forms 
of living. Political power breeds more power – the system is out of control 
and must be brought back under control. Controversial mandatory medicine, especially 
mandatory vaccines must be stopped. This socially malignant situation is under 
the control of the educated, ruling classes, particularly that part of the scientific 
community (NIH, CDC, FDA, AMA etc.) exerting influence on government policy. 
Mandatory vaccination is the most repugnant idea ever put forth by organized 
medicine. It gives the government power to invade our most private space, our 
bodies. This is the most private domain of the citizen, their own body! Mandatory 
vaccination puts one in mind of the eugenics of Nazi Germany. The demand to 
yield to MANDATORY injection of a foreign substance into a human body under 
circumstances that highly intelligent specialists in all fields of scientific 
endeavor consider to be, at the very minimum, highly controversial, cannot AND 
WILL NOT be tolerated.
	Courts Order Kid To Do Chemotherapy
	
	(August 29) - A 12-year-old boy remains in hiding with his mother while authorities 
in Utah battle to have him returned to undergo court-ordered chemotherapy to 
treat what they say is deadly bone cancer. Daren and Barbara Jensen fled Utah 
with their son, Parker, on Aug. 8, after the state ordered that the cancer-stricken 
boy be placed in state custody so that he can receive chemotherapy. The story 
began three months ago, when Parker was diagnosed with Ewing's sarcoma, a deadly 
form of bone cancer. Doctors at Primary Children's Medical Center in Salt Lake 
City said Parker needs chemotherapy, and that he has only a 5 percent chance 
of survival without it. A Salt Lake City court agreed, and ordered the parents 
to have the boy undergo the treatment. But the boy's family disagreed. They 
question the accuracy of the test that led to his cancer diagnosis, said Parker's 
uncle, Tracy Jensen.